Have Americans lost the guts for democracy?

Every time George W. Bush gets caught in a tight spot, he does the same thing: He plays the 9 / 11 fear card, wraps himself in the flag, emits jawdropping falsehoods and all but accuses his critics of treason. So it is with the stunning revelation that the White House has ordered the illegal, warrantless wiretapping of American citizens in brazen defiance of federal law and the U. S. Constitution. If allowed to stand, Bush’s actions will have taken the United States a long way down the road to military dictatorship. Indeed, that’s essentially what his legalistic enablers, starting with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Vice President Dick Cheney, argue: that in wartime, the commander-in-chief can take any action he deems appropriate to protect the nation, bypassing Congress and the courts to assert the primacy of the presidency until declaring victory in the “war on terror.” As terrorism is not an enemy, but a tactic—a vile, cowardly tactic, but by definition not subject to being defeated—the metaphorical war against it could last indefinitely. And as long as it lasts, the commander-in-chief rules by fiat. Our constitutional rights exist at his sufferance.

But there are a great many Americans who either don’t comprehend what’s at stake or cannot bring themselves to believe it. That’s the reason for Bush’s deceptive sound bite during a recent visit to an Army hospital in San Antonio, where he claimed that the only communications the National Security Agency monitors are from foreign terrorist cells to the United States.

Adopting a pseudo-folksy tone that makes him sound as if he’s reading “My Pet Goat” to third-graders, Bush allowed as how “If somebody from al-Qa’ida is calling you, we’d like to know why.... I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy’s thinking.”

Well, no kidding. No sane person opposes that kind of surveillance.

Of course, the secret FISA court (for Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act ) required by federal law to authorize wiretaps would issue a warrant in 30 seconds flat to monitor al-Qa’ida-related communications, even several days after the fact. It’s rejected roughly a half-dozen of almost 20,000 applications.

Indeed, the Bush White House had to “clarify” the president’s remarks, which he repeated several times. Bush’s wiretaps are known to monitor both incoming and outgoing calls, but are exponentially larger in scope. Moreover, as The Washington Post has reported, NSA has been not only “data mining” millions of communications foreign and domestic, but passing on the results to other government agencies such as the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the CIA and the Department of Homeland Security.

The way TV news works, however, many Americans would only get to hear Bush’s dishonest sound bite, a technically truthful statement calculated to deceive. See, there have to be reasons the administration kept its actions hidden. Right now, we don’t know what they are, ut we do know that Deputy Attorney General James Comey, who had personally prosecuted al-Qa’ida terrorists, refused to sign off on White House wiretaps, as apparently did former Attorney General John “Let the Eagle Soar” Ashcroft. Under Gonzales, the Justice Department now plans to investigate the whistleblowers who exposed Bush’s defiance of the rule of law. A more upside-down situation can hardly be imagined. How can this great nation have been brought to such a pass by a few thousand stateless fanatics hiding in caves?
Have Americans still got the guts for democracy?
Whatever happened, I wonder, to “the land of the free and the home of the brave”?

dirty tricks aimed at the Democrats

According to a report in Sunday's New York Times, in 2004, the White House found itself unable to continue with its warrantless NSA domestic spying campaign because James B. Comey, acting attorney general while John Ashcroft was hospitalized with an inflamed gall bladder, would not approve it.


Seems the White House had set up a system where the president could authorize the spying without notifying the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, but he should get the okay form his own Justice Department. But what the White House wanted the National Security Agency to do apparently worried so Comey--no hero of civil liberties--that he wouldn't sign on.


This led the president and his spymasters to turn to Ashcroft himself--the man who pushed through the USA PATRIOT Act and who tried, with a mad scheme called Operation TIPS, to turn 20 million Americans into volunteer spies on their neighbors. Reportedly White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and then White House counsel (and now Attorney General) Alberto Gonzales, went to the hospital where Ashcroft was undergoing a difficult recovery from his operation, and asked him to give the needed approval.


Pretty scary right?


But it gets worse! According to the Times, even Ashcroft was "reluctant" to sign on to what the White House and the NSA were doing.


So just what were they doing?


I think it's safe to say that they were probably not just tapping phones and emails of suspected terrorists. That would surely not have bothered Comey or Ashcroft.


I had earlier assumed that much of the NSA spying that Bush was approving illegally was on anti-war activists.


But think about it: why would that bother Ashcroft? He on several occasions equated anti-war activists with terrorists himself, so surely this kind of spying wouldn't have been hard for him to sign onto.


No, it had to be something so obviously and patently unconstitutional and criminal that Ashcroft had visions of himself following Nixon's AG, John Mitchell, into the slammer when it finally got exposed.


And what might that spying be?


My guess is that it has to do with the 2004 election, and dirty tricks aimed at the Democrats.


So get ready. Either this stinking swamp of deception and criminality is about to be dragged into the sunlight and exposed, or we are heading into a very dark time of tyranny under one-party rule.